sourcegraph
February 9, 2023

A digital rights advocate told Fox News that Elon Musk’s recent actions, such as the banning of an account that tracked his private jet, suggest that the decisions behind Twitter’s ban were “completely arbitrary and capricious.”

“My first reaction is that this fits perfectly with what we’ve seen over the past few weeks, where suspension and ban decisions are entirely arbitrary and capricious,” said Corynne McSherry, legal director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights organisation, told Fox News.

WATCH: What does Musk’s Twitter ban show?

Watch more FOX News digital original content here

Wednesday, Musk suspends @ElonJet – a Twitter account that tracks the CEO’s private jet – and the personal account of the operator, Jack Sweeney, a student at the University of Central Florida. Musk had previously said he would keep the account active to promote free speech, but ultimately claimed it posed a threat to him and his family because it shared his real-time location.

McSherry said Wednesday that bans “will definitely continue to happen.” By Thursday night, several reporters had been suspended, including CNN reporter Dono Sullivan and New York Times reporter Ryan Mack.

Elon Musk’s ‘Twitter dossier’ has House Republicans weighing in on congressional investigations

Musk, who bought Twitter for $44B in October, has tweeted that the @ElonJet account is putting his son at risk and that his support for Sweeney and others will hurt him The family’s organization took legal action.

“Elon Musk claims it’s a personal safety issue, but I don’t think that’s credible given that this is publicly available data,” McSherry said.

Twitter suspended several journalists after the platform suspended the @ElonJet account, which Musk claimed had been removed due to personal safety risks.
(Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto, Carina Johansen/NTB/AFP)

Musk defended his decision to ban reporters in a Twitter Spaces chat Thursday night with several reporters, including suspended Washington Post reporter Drew Harrell. The Twitter chief left the chatroom after being asked if the platform used the same tools he accused former company executives of using to suppress stories about Hunter Biden’s laptop.

“On the one hand, he and company are exercising their First Amendment rights, which they are allowed to do,” McSherry said between @elonjet and the reporter’s suspension. “On the other hand, I do think it’s inconsistent with some of the things he’s said about content moderation being critical.”

Twitter transcript: Dallas residents rate Elon’s efforts to overhaul social media platform

Twitter and other social media platforms need to clarify “what their standards are for violence, harassment, safety, and then abide by those standards,” McSherry told Fox News.

“What this really underscores for everyone is something that we’ve been focusing on for a while now, which is the enormous concentration of power in online speech in the hands of a relatively small number of people,” McSherry continued. “I do think that’s dangerous for speech as a whole because it means they do have a lot of power to shape speech.”

McSherry said content moderation is difficult, but social media platforms need to do better by creating clearer and consistent policies.

McSherry said content moderation is difficult, but social media platforms need to do better by creating clearer and consistent policies.
(Getty Images)

Click here for the Fox News app

Twitter did not respond to a request for comment.

To learn more from McSherry about the influence social media executives have on online speech, click here.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *